Comments on: Protecting Your Assets In Turbulent Times http://www.ifa-sg.com/protecting-your-assets-in-turbulent-times/ Tue, 06 Dec 2011 12:42:36 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: Alvin http://www.ifa-sg.com/protecting-your-assets-in-turbulent-times/comment-page-1/#comment-262 Alvin Fri, 03 Apr 2009 15:59:52 +0000 http://www.ifa-sg.com/?p=997#comment-262 I am actually short sighted :p I am actually short sighted :p

]]> By: admin http://www.ifa-sg.com/protecting-your-assets-in-turbulent-times/comment-page-1/#comment-258 admin Sun, 29 Mar 2009 09:46:30 +0000 http://www.ifa-sg.com/?p=997#comment-258 Hi Alvin, Thanks for spotting the error. The returns for property funds should be -24.8% instead of 24.8%. Do you take supplements for your eyes? ;p Hi Alvin,

Thanks for spotting the error. The returns for property funds should be -24.8% instead of 24.8%.

Do you take supplements for your eyes? ;p

]]> By: Alvin http://www.ifa-sg.com/protecting-your-assets-in-turbulent-times/comment-page-1/#comment-257 Alvin Sun, 29 Mar 2009 05:12:41 +0000 http://www.ifa-sg.com/?p=997#comment-257 Hi Mr Eng, Read your article in INVEST mag. A good review on the performance of the various asset class before and after the crash. I think the bar chart for property fund is wrong as it should be -24.8% and not 24.8%. It was mentioned in your paragraph that there is a difference of 75.6% from it's peak return of 50.8% prior to the crash. Nonetheless, I enjoyed the article :) Hi Mr Eng,

Read your article in INVEST mag. A good review on the performance of the various asset class before and after the crash.

I think the bar chart for property fund is wrong as it should be -24.8% and not 24.8%. It was mentioned in your paragraph that there is a difference of 75.6% from it’s peak return of 50.8% prior to the crash.

Nonetheless, I enjoyed the article :)

]]>