To a certain degree, I agree with you on the fine prints part.

However, what I dun like is the fact that they are trying to entice people through such ‘gimmick’.

Being a trusted stat board, people would naturally put even more faith in what they say. As the CPF system gets more complicated, its becoming harder for layman to understand their policies. Although the complexity is unlikely to reach the level of those ‘minibombs’, it will still lead to people getting the wrong idea.